{"id":7126,"date":"2022-04-07T11:23:11","date_gmt":"2022-04-07T11:23:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/issue\/%issue_post%\/article\/polarization-harms-democracy-and-society\/"},"modified":"2022-04-07T11:23:11","modified_gmt":"2022-04-07T11:23:11","slug":"polarization-harms-democracy-and-society","status":"publish","type":"article","link":"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/en\/article\/polarization-harms-democracy-and-society\/","title":{"rendered":"Polarization harms democracy and society"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>                <span id=\"square\"><\/span>                <span id=\"first-word\">Severe polarization makes democracy vulnerable.<\/span> In healthy democracies, opposing sides are seen as political adversaries to compete against and at times to negotiate with.In deeply polarized democracies, the other side comes to be seen as an enemy needing to be vanquished.            <\/p>\n<p> A collaborative research project I led<a href=\"articles_centrals\/article_central_2\/#ref\"><sup>1<\/sup><\/a> on polarized democracies around the world examines the processes by which societies divide into political \u201ctribes\u201d and democracy is harmed. Based on a study of eleven countries including the U.S., Turkey, Hungary, Venezuela, Thailand and others, we found that when political leaders cast their opponents as immoral or corrupt, they create \u201cus\u201d and \u201cthem\u201d camps \u2013called by political scientists and psychologists \u201cin-groups\u201d and \u201cout-groups\u2013 in the society.  <\/p>\n<p> In this tribal dynamic, each side views the other \u201cout group\u201d party with increasing distrust, bias and enmity. Perceptions that \u201cIf you win, I lose\u201d grow. Each side views the other political party and their supporters as a threat to the nation or their way of life if that other political party is in power. For that reason, the incumbent\u2019s followers tolerate more illiberal and increasingly authoritarian behavior to stay in power, while the opponents are more and more willing to resort to undemocratic means to remove them from power. This damages democracy. <\/p>\n<p class=\"sicip\"> <b>Drivers of polarization<\/b> <\/p>\n<p> Our research finds that severe polarization is affected by three primary factors<a href=\"articles_centrals\/article_central_2\/#ref\"><sup>2<\/sup><\/a>: <\/p>\n<p> <b>1. Politicians Divide<\/b> <\/p>\n<p> First, it is often stimulated by the rhetoric of political leaders who exploit the real grievances of voters. These politicians choose divisive issues to highlight in order to pursue their own political agenda. They might exploit real grievances and anxieties about unemployment or crime, or they may even manufacture a threat, such as Donald Trump calling Central American refugees an \u201cinvading army\u201d. <\/p>\n<p> In extreme polarization, people feel distant from and suspicious of the \u201cother\u201d camp. At the same time, they feel loyal to, and trusting of, their own camp \u2013 without examining their biases or factual basis of their information. Thus they are susceptible to the rhetoric of political leaders aiming to generate votes based on fear of the \u201cother\u201d. Although this is a common phenomenon long identified by social psychology, it is even more pronounced in the age of social media 24-hour news cycles and more politicized media outlets who repeat and amplify the political attacks.  <\/p>\n<p>                        <cite class=\"cita-center\">                                                In extreme polarization, people feel distant from and suspicious of the \u201cother\u201d camp. They feel loyal to, and trusting of, their own camp \u2013without examining their biases or factual basis of their information            <\/cite>                                         <\/p>\n<p> <b>2. Oppositions React<\/b> <\/p>\n<p> Polarization, though, is a two-way street. How the political opposition reacts is the second factor explaining the impact of polarization on democracy. If the opposition returns the bitter rhetoric and winner-take-all tactics with similar political hardball and demonizing language, they risk locking in place a cycle that leads to entrenching the politics of polarization.  <\/p>\n<p> On the other hand, if they mobilize voters around a positive democratizing message and resist tit-for-tat strategies, they can begin to depolarize. <\/p>\n<p> <b>3. Polarizing Rifts<\/b> <\/p>\n<p> The third, and most difficult, obstacle is what our research found about the underlying basis of polarization. When countries polarize around rifts<a href=\"articles_centrals\/article_central_2\/#ref\"><sup>3<\/sup><\/a> that reflect unresolved debates present at the country\u2019s formation, then that polarization is most likely to be enduring and harmful.  <\/p>\n<p> These rifts are often around concepts of national identity and citizenship rights. This type of polarization is particularly pernicious because it revolves around debates over who is a legitimate citizen and who can legitimately represent them. For example, the U.S. was founded on unequal citizenship rights for African-Americans, Native Americans and women. As these groups reasserted their rights in the 1960s civil rights movement and the 1970s women\u2019s movement, polarization around these rights and changing <a href=\"https:\/\/www.asc.upenn.edu\/news-events\/news\/fear-losing-status-not-economic-hardship-drove-voters-2016-presidential-election\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">group status<\/a> grew.<\/p>\n<p>In Spain and Canada, unresolved rifts around regional identity and autonomy have periodically erupted into national conflict, most recently seen in the debate over Catalan independence versus Spanish unity in the 2019 election. <\/p>\n<p class=\"sicip\"> <b>The Dangerous Logic of Polarization<\/b> <\/p>\n<p> <b>1. Polarization rewards extreme positions and weakens centrist moderates<\/b> <\/p>\n<p> Polarizing leaders and parties need enemies to establish a dividing line between \u201cUs\u201d and \u201cThem.\u201d They stoke fear of these enemies to keep winning elections. The enemies can be external (immigrants in Hungary, foreign imperialists in Venezuela) or internal (Kurdish terrorists in Turkey, the media in the U.S., and anyone who does not agree with the leader). The extremists on either side of the divide then label moderates willing to compromise as \u201ctraitors colluding with the enemy\u201d or \u201csell-outs.\u201d In this way, the center disappears and radical positions dominate, resulting in political gridlock or even violent conflict.  <\/p>\n<p> <b>2. Polarization affects individual perceptions and is hard to reverse once in place<\/b> <\/p>\n<p> Once a polarized way of thinking seeps in and voters feel deeply divided psychologically and spatially, it is very hard to reverse. Research<a href=\"articles_centrals\/article_central_2\/#ref\"><sup>4<\/sup><\/a> on motivated reasoning helps us understand this problem. Emotions and unconscious desires and fears<a href=\"articles_centrals\/article_central_2\/#ref\"><sup>5<\/sup><\/a> influence the way we interpret information, especially if we feel threatened. Voters are motivated to eliminate cognitive dissonance by rejecting facts that challenge their worldviews or self-concepts. Polarizing leaders learn that exploiting supporters\u2019 fears and anxieties will win elections \u2013and encourage that motivated reasoning. <\/p>\n<p> As a result, when the Venezuelan government spins conspiracy theories to explain the nation\u2019s dire problems, its hard-core supporters apparently believe them without question. Similarly, Trump\u2019s birther movement resisted factual information about President Obama\u2019s birthplace. <\/p>\n<p>                        <cite class=\"cita-center\">                                                Once a polarized way of thinking seeps in and voters feel deeply divided psychologically and spatially, it is very hard to reverse            <\/cite>                        <\/p>\n<p> <b>3. Tit-for-tat tactics deepen polarization and often backfire.<\/b> <\/p>\n<p> An obstructionist strategy deepens polarization and can endanger democracy. Treating politics as a tit-for-tat game may result in being pushed off the field of play. For instance, in Venezuela, the political opposition refused to negotiate<a href=\"articles_centrals\/article_central_2\/#ref\"><sup>6<\/sup><\/a> with President Ch\u00e1vez, and instead tried for three years to oust him from the presidency through both constitutional and unconstitutional methods. When that failed, they boycotted a legislative election \u2013and forfeited control of the Congress entirely to Ch\u00e1vez\u2019s party, giving it the power to make Supreme Court and Electoral Council appointments for the next decade. <\/p>\n<p class=\"sicip\"> <b>Backing away from polarization<\/b> <\/p>\n<p> It is possible to sidestep polarization or even depolarize without either allowing undemocratic behavior or running away from a fight over principles and issues. To avoid deepening the state of division and distrust that seems to pervade our societies, both political leaders and citizens must play a part. Simply withdrawing from politics is not effective. <\/p>\n<p> Citizens can protect themselves and their democracy by being aware of the political and psychological workings of polarization and the early warning signs of democratic erosion. They can refuse to participate in the trap of demonizing politics, while insisting on voting massively against those who use polarizing methods. Political leaders should be conscious that their words and actions can advance, prevent or reverse severe polarization.  <\/p>\n<p> For those who prioritize winning for their team above all, the realization that they will eventually be the losers of their re-engineered rules should be sobering. For those who have a broader perspective focused on the collective interests and welfare of the society, understanding the logic of polarization that blocks cooperative problem-solving could instill the courage to cross the divide rather than reciprocate pernicious polarizing strategies. <\/p>\n<p><b>ABOUT THE AUTHOR<\/b><br \/>Jennifer McCoy, PhD, is Professor of Political Science at Georgia State University in Atlanta, GA, USA and Senior Fellow at the Institute for Advanced Studies at Central European University in Budapest in 2019.She leads a research group on polarization and its consequences for democracy. <\/p>\n<p id=\"ref\" class=\"referencia first-reference\"> *Parts of this article appeared previously in:<br \/>The Washington Post:<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/news\/monkey-cage\/wp\/2017\/04\/03\/before-going-nuclear-republicans-and-democrats-might-consider-these-four-lessons-from-polarized-democracies\/?utm_term=.b0ab7f2fc774\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">\u201cBefore going nuclear, Republicans and Democrats might consider these four lessons from polarized democracies\u201d<\/a><br \/>The conversation: <a href=\"https:\/\/theconversation.com\/extreme-political-polarization-weakens-democracy-can-the-us-avoid-that-fate-105540\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">\u201cExtreme political polarization weakens democracy \u2013 can the US avoid thatfate?\u201d<\/a> <\/p>\n<p id=\"ref\" class=\"referencia\">1. See the article \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/journals.sagepub.com\/doi\/full\/10.1177\/0002764218759576\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy: Common Patterns, Dynamics, and Pernicious Consequences for Democratic Polities<\/a>\u201d, by Jennifer McCoy, Tahmina Rahman and Murat Somer, March 20, 2018. <\/p>\n<p id=\"ref\" class=\"referencia\">2. See the article &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/publication\/328538486_Toward_a_Theory_of_Pernicious_Polarization_and_How_It_Harms_Democracies_Comparative_Evidence_and_Possible_Remedies_Forthcoming_in_a_Special_Issue_of_the_Annals_of_the_American_Academy_of_Political_and\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Toward a Theory of Pernicious Polarization and How It Harms Democracies: Comparative Evidence and Possible Remedies<\/a>&#8220;. Forthcoming in a Special Issue of the Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, guest editors Jennifer McCoy and Murat Somer, January 2019.  <\/p>\n<p id=\"ref\" class=\"referencia\">3. See the article &#8220;<a href=\"https:\/\/www.researchgate.net\/publication\/328538491_Transformations_through_Polarizations_and_Global_Threats_to_Democracy_Forthcoming_in_a_Special_Issue_of_the_Annals_of_the_American_Academy_of_Political_and_Social_Sciences_guest_editors_Jennifer_McCoy\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Transformations through Polarizations and Global Threats to Democracy<\/a>&#8220;. Forthcoming in a Special Issue of the Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Sciences, guest editors Jennifer McCoy and Murat Somer, January 2019.  <\/p>\n<p id=\"ref\" class=\"referencia\">4. See \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/www.dartmouth.edu\/~nyhan\/opening-political-mind.pdf\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">The roles of information deficits and identity threat in the prevalence of misperceptions<\/a>\u201d, by Brendan Nyhan, Dartmouth College and Jason Reifler. December 21, 2017. <\/p>\n<p id=\"ref\" class=\"referencia\">5. See the article \u201c<a href=\"https:\/\/ideas.ted.com\/why-you-think-youre-right-even-when-youre-wrong\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Why you think you\u2019re right, even when you\u2019re wrong<\/a>\u201d, by Julia Galef, March 2017. <\/p>\n<p id=\"ref\" class=\"referencia\">6. Jennifer McCoy, Franciso Diez <a href=\"https:\/\/www.usip.org\/publications\/2011\/10\/international-mediation-venezuela\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\"><em>International Mediation in Venezuela<\/em><\/a><em>, <\/em>USIP Press, 2011. <\/p>\n<p class=\"foto\"> \t<a href=\"https:\/\/unsplash.com\/photos\/o-dkYSvidB4?utm_source=unsplash&amp;utm_medium=referral&amp;utm_content=creditCopyText\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Fotografia<\/a> d\u2019Arturo Castaneyra\t <\/p>\n<p class=\"gencat\">\u00a9 Generalitat de Catalunya<\/p>\n","protected":false},"featured_media":7143,"menu_order":3,"template":"","categories":[6],"class_list":["post-7126","article","type-article","status-publish","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-articles-centrals"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v25.6 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Polarization harms democracy and society - Peace in Progress magazine<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/en\/article\/polarization-harms-democracy-and-society\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Polarization harms democracy and society - Peace in Progress magazine\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Severe polarization makes democracy vulnerable. In healthy democracies, opposing sides are seen as political adversaries to compete against and at times to negotiate with.In deeply polarized democracies, the other side comes to be seen as an enemy needing to be vanquished. A collaborative research project I led1 on polarized democracies around the world examines the [&hellip;]\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/en\/article\/polarization-harms-democracy-and-society\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Peace in Progress magazine\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/article_central_2_2560-17-518x720.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"518\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"720\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"7 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\/\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/en\/article\/polarization-harms-democracy-and-society\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/en\/article\/polarization-harms-democracy-and-society\/\",\"name\":\"Polarization harms democracy and society - Peace in Progress magazine\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/en\/article\/polarization-harms-democracy-and-society\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/en\/article\/polarization-harms-democracy-and-society\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/article_central_2_2560-17.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2022-04-07T11:23:11+00:00\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/en\/article\/polarization-harms-democracy-and-society\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/en\/article\/polarization-harms-democracy-and-society\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/article_central_2_2560-17.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/article_central_2_2560-17.jpg\",\"width\":1152,\"height\":1600},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/\",\"name\":\"Peace in Progress magazine\",\"description\":\"The magazine of the International Catalan Institute for Peace\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Peace in Progress magazine\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\",\"url\":\"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/ICIP_logo.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/ICIP_logo.jpg\",\"width\":1025,\"height\":1024,\"caption\":\"Peace in Progress magazine\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/\"}}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Polarization harms democracy and society - Peace in Progress magazine","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/en\/article\/polarization-harms-democracy-and-society\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Polarization harms democracy and society - Peace in Progress magazine","og_description":"Severe polarization makes democracy vulnerable. In healthy democracies, opposing sides are seen as political adversaries to compete against and at times to negotiate with.In deeply polarized democracies, the other side comes to be seen as an enemy needing to be vanquished. A collaborative research project I led1 on polarized democracies around the world examines the [&hellip;]","og_url":"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/en\/article\/polarization-harms-democracy-and-society\/","og_site_name":"Peace in Progress magazine","og_image":[{"width":518,"height":720,"url":"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/article_central_2_2560-17-518x720.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Est. reading time":"7 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/en\/article\/polarization-harms-democracy-and-society\/","url":"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/en\/article\/polarization-harms-democracy-and-society\/","name":"Polarization harms democracy and society - Peace in Progress magazine","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/en\/article\/polarization-harms-democracy-and-society\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/en\/article\/polarization-harms-democracy-and-society\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/article_central_2_2560-17.jpg","datePublished":"2022-04-07T11:23:11+00:00","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/en\/article\/polarization-harms-democracy-and-society\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/en\/article\/polarization-harms-democracy-and-society\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/article_central_2_2560-17.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/04\/article_central_2_2560-17.jpg","width":1152,"height":1600},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/","name":"Peace in Progress magazine","description":"The magazine of the International Catalan Institute for Peace","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/#organization","name":"Peace in Progress magazine","url":"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/ICIP_logo.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/ICIP_logo.jpg","width":1025,"height":1024,"caption":"Peace in Progress magazine"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article\/7126","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/article"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/article"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/7143"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7126"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.icip.cat\/perlapau\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7126"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}